[This is a preview of our new eBook on annihialationism or "no hellers" - ed]
Annihilationism
(also called conditional
immortality or destructionism) is
the theological view that the wicked will not suffer eternal conscious torment
in hell, but will ultimately be destroyed—annihilated—so
that they no longer exist. This view contrasts with traditional eternalism,
which holds that all people live forever—either in heaven or in hell—and that
the damned experience conscious punishment forever.
CORE TENETS OF ANNIHILATIONISM:
Immortality is Conditional
Human beings are not inherently immortal; only those who are saved in Christ
receive eternal life (John 3:16; Romans 6:23). The unsaved do not continue in eternal torment—they
perish.
The
Final Punishment Is Destruction, Not Endless Torment
Verses such as:
“The wages of sin are death” (Rom. 6:23)
“They will be destroyed” (Phil. 3:19; 2 Thess. 1:9)
“Fear him who can destroy both soul and body in hell” (Matt. 10:28). They are interpreted to mean total obliteration of the wicked.
God’s Justice and Mercy
Annihilationists argue that eternal conscious torment is inconsistent with the
justice and character of God, who is both just and merciful.
KEY BIBLICAL PASSAGES USED BY ANNIHILATIONISTS
Verse |
Annihilationist Interpretation |
John 3:16 |
The wicked “perish” rather than suffer eternally. |
Malachi 4:1-3 |
The wicked are like stubble, burned up, leaving “neither
root nor branch.” |
Matthew 10:28 |
God destroys both soul and body in hell. |
Romans 6:23 |
“The wages of sin is death,” not unending torment. |
2 Thessalonians 1:9 |
“Everlasting destruction” implies cessation of existence. |
Revelation 20:14–15 |
The “second death” is the final annihilation. |
MAJOR HISTORICAL AND MODERN PROPONENTS
Name |
Notes |
Arnobius of Sicca (4th c.) |
Early church fathers taught that the wicked perish. |
Edward Fudge |
Author of The Fire
That Consumes, a modern defense of annihilationism. |
John Stott |
Influential Anglican theologian who expressed openness to
the view. |
Clark Pinnock |
Argued for conditional immortality as more biblical and
ethical. |
Seventh-day Adventists |
Officially hold to annihilationism and conditional
immortality. |
Christadelphians |
Reject inherent immortality; believe the wicked cease to
exist. |
CRITIQUES OF ANNIHILATIONISM
Tradition
of Eternal Conscious Punishment
Augustine, Aquinas, Calvin,
and most of church history affirm eternal torment.
Revelation 14:11 and 20:10
speak of smoke rising “forever and ever.”
Nature
of the Soul
Classical theology teaches
that the soul is naturally immortal, and thus cannot be destroyed.
Severity
of Sin
Critics argue that the
gravity of sin against an infinite God warrants infinite punishment.
COMPARISON TABLE
Doctrine |
Eternal Torment (Traditional) |
Annihilationism |
Universalism |
Fate of the wicked |
Eternal conscious punishment |
Final destruction |
Eventual salvation of all |
View of the soul |
Inherently immortal |
Conditionally immortal |
Inherently immortal |
Justice of God |
Punishment fits sin's gravity |
Punishment ends in death |
Mercy ultimately triumphs |
Main proponents |
Augustine, Calvin, Edwards |
Fudge, Stott, Adventists |
Origen, Gregory of Nyssa, Rob Bell |
Old School Baptists—particularly the Primitive Baptists of the 19th century—firmly rejected Annihilationism as a heretical departure from the biblical doctrine of eternal punishment. They upheld eternal conscious torment for the wicked as a solemn and foundational truth of divine justice, based on a plain reading of Scripture and their historic confessions.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for commenting. If an answer is needed, we will respond.