To whom all Communications must be addressed. COMMUNICATIONS. For the Signs of the Times. Absolute Predestination of all things. No. 1. This sentiment, as expressed in the Prospectus of the “Signs of the Times,” has called forth so much invective from some, and so much ridicule from others of the popular Baptists of this region that one would conclude some strange and absurd idea had been advanced; some absurd whim daringly promulgated as a part of the secret things of God. It, therefore, may not be amiss to re-examine the subject and enquire whether it be a revealed truth of God, or a visionary notion of man, which is calling forth such malicious sneers from those who profess to be the servants of God. Predestination is the same in meaning, with fore-ordination or fore-appointment; and is with God, one with pre-determination; for as God declares, so he determines, the end from the beginning; saying my counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure. Thus the pre-determination of God, to admit sin into the world embraced in it the decreeing of the time, manner, result &c. of that event. And his pre-determination to bruise his Son in the place of sinners included in it the instruments, time, place and manner of his death. Compare Acts ii, 23 and 4th, 25--28, and John xiii, 1, and Heb. xiii, 11, 12. The doctrine of predestination, then, is this, that God has so pre-determined every event, as to fix with such precision its limits and bounds, its causes and effects, that with him it is divested of all contingency. This, Brother Beebe, is the monstrous doctrine, which you engage to maintain, in your Paper, and which we Old Fashioned Baptists, some of us, profess to believe, and which is drawing down upon you and us the reproaches and contempt of all the learned gentry among the Baptists. The term absolute, has been prefixed by yourself and others to the word predestination, to distinguish the doctrine you hold from the idea of a conditional predestination. Strictly speaking, however, this is an unnecessary appendage. A conditional predestination is no predestination; for the predestination of an event conditionally is but a pre-determination to leave the event undetermined, and therefore excludes predestination altogether. him who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will.” In these passages, we have not only the word predestination used in the translation, but in the original the Greek word employed is of a corresponding signification; being Proorizo, formed of Pro, before, and Orizo, to bound, or limit, to determine, to define &c., and is derived from the theme, oros, a bound or limit, or the end of a thing. Hence, the literal signification of the word, used is a fixing before, the bound or limit, of a thing or event. If we look at the connexion, we shall find the idea conveyed by the word fully sustained by its use in these cases. In Rom. viii, 29 and 30. The whole of the Apostle's argument in these and the following verses of this Chap. are in support of the declaration he makes, verse 28; “And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are called according to his purpose.” To this, the enquiry might be made, how, Paul, can we know this? “For, or because,” is the answer, “whom he did foreknow” that is as the objects of his purpose and call, “he did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren.” Did he decree that they should be like Christ, should partake of his image; should, as his brethren participate in that life that is in him, in a justification from the demands of the law, in the Father’s peculiar love and care, in the resurrection, and in that glory which the Father gave him &c. And this was no inefficient purpose, “Moreover whom he did predestinate, them he also called, and whom he called, them he also justified; and whom he justified; them he also glorified.”—Paul, now retorts some enquiries to those, who might doubt the assertion made vs. 28; he asks vs. 31, “what shall we say to these things? If God be for us, who can be against us?” Or more emphatically “who against us,” that is who is it, that is against us?—He goes on to confirm his position by a series of enquiries, in which he shows that the predestination of God, is firm against all the assaults of tribulation or distress &c. and against death and life, and angels and principalities, and powers, and things present, and things to come, and height and depth &c. Thus, we see that the predestination of God, in this case, not only secures the leading purpose, that the Elect shall be conformed to the glorious image of his Son, but also fixes the limits and determines the end of all things which transpire in relation to them. Again if we refer to the use of the word in Eph. we shall find that the predestination, and the determination of purpose of God, go together. Thus Chap. i, verses 4—6, according as he hath chosen us in him, before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love. Having predestinated us to the adoption of children by Jesus Christ, to himself according to the good pleasure of his will,—To the praise of the glory of his grace wherein he hath made us accepted in the beloved. Predestination is here represented to be according to the good pleasure of his will, and is a decreeing of the objects of his choice unto the adoption of children by Christ Jesus, before the foundation of the world; but determines at that early period, their being accepted in the Beloved; and of course decides with certainty, their repenting, believing, and being sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise; things necessarily embraced in their experimental acceptance in Christ. Again in vs. 11th, the Apostle speaks of having obtained an inheritance as the result of that predestination of God which is according to the purpose of him who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will. Here then, we have in these and the connecting verses every part of salvation brought to view as the predestination of God. For he worketh all things, not according to the caprice of fallen men, nor according to any fortuitous circumstances which may transpire, but according to the counsel of his own will. If then it is a fact, as the Apostle declares that God worketh all things after the counsel of his own will, then does the counsel of God’s own will, not only determine with certainty all the parts of salvation and fix the whole chosen race, blameless before him in love in the possession of their inheritance, as heirs of God and joint heirs with Christ, but also decrees the result of all events according to his good pleasure. If all persons with whom we have to do, were disposed, cheerfully to submit to the decision of Divine Revelation, there would be but one question more to decide, in order to determine whether all things, absolutely, or things in a limited sense, are predestinated, or worked according to the decision of the counsel of God’s own will, & that question is,—how far does the government of God extend? If his government extends universally over matter and mind, then there is no movement either of matter or mind but what God works after the counsel of his own will, or determines the result thereof according to the good pleasure of his will. King Nebuchadnezzar evidently thought that God’s Dominion was universal, over Heaven and earth, for he says of him, He doeth according to his will in the army of Heaven, and among the inhabitants of the earth; and none can stay his hand, or say unto him, what doest thou? Dan. iv, 35. And the King was certainly correct in this, for Christ assured his Disciples, Math. xxviii, 18, that all power was given to him in Heaven and in earth; that is as Mediator. If so, God had it in his own hands to give. Again Christ says, John xvii, 2. “As thou hast given him power over all flesh, that he should give eternal life to as many as thou hast given him.” Hence his power is over the wicked as well as over those to whom he gives eternal life: and it being all power, it must extend to both matter and mind, as there can be no disposing influence, or power besides, and therefore, the devices both of men and devils, as well as their actions, must be under his control. Still, however, many persons are unwilling to believe, that the predestination of God has any thing to do with the wicked actions of men or devils. They, in order to be consistent with themselves, ought to believe that wickedness is under the control of an opposite power, and that God exercises no control over wicked actions or thoughts, to limit their extent, or to overrule their results in accordance with his purposes; lest thereby he should be charged with being the author of sin. I think, however, I shall be able to bring from the Scriptures of truth several facts which go to prove that the predestination of God determines the results, fixes the limits, and so controls the actions and devices of wicked men & devils, so as to cause them to terminate in the furtherance of his own glorious purposes. But as I wish not to be tedious, I will leave the further consideration of this subject for another Number.
Translate
Historic
Historic
Wednesday, April 1, 2026
Eldefr Samuel Trott on Predestination (Trott) 1834 Signs
To whom all Communications must be addressed. COMMUNICATIONS. For the Signs of the Times. Absolute Predestination of all things. No. 1. This sentiment, as expressed in the Prospectus of the “Signs of the Times,” has called forth so much invective from some, and so much ridicule from others of the popular Baptists of this region that one would conclude some strange and absurd idea had been advanced; some absurd whim daringly promulgated as a part of the secret things of God. It, therefore, may not be amiss to re-examine the subject and enquire whether it be a revealed truth of God, or a visionary notion of man, which is calling forth such malicious sneers from those who profess to be the servants of God. Predestination is the same in meaning, with fore-ordination or fore-appointment; and is with God, one with pre-determination; for as God declares, so he determines, the end from the beginning; saying my counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure. Thus the pre-determination of God, to admit sin into the world embraced in it the decreeing of the time, manner, result &c. of that event. And his pre-determination to bruise his Son in the place of sinners included in it the instruments, time, place and manner of his death. Compare Acts ii, 23 and 4th, 25--28, and John xiii, 1, and Heb. xiii, 11, 12. The doctrine of predestination, then, is this, that God has so pre-determined every event, as to fix with such precision its limits and bounds, its causes and effects, that with him it is divested of all contingency. This, Brother Beebe, is the monstrous doctrine, which you engage to maintain, in your Paper, and which we Old Fashioned Baptists, some of us, profess to believe, and which is drawing down upon you and us the reproaches and contempt of all the learned gentry among the Baptists. The term absolute, has been prefixed by yourself and others to the word predestination, to distinguish the doctrine you hold from the idea of a conditional predestination. Strictly speaking, however, this is an unnecessary appendage. A conditional predestination is no predestination; for the predestination of an event conditionally is but a pre-determination to leave the event undetermined, and therefore excludes predestination altogether. him who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will.” In these passages, we have not only the word predestination used in the translation, but in the original the Greek word employed is of a corresponding signification; being Proorizo, formed of Pro, before, and Orizo, to bound, or limit, to determine, to define &c., and is derived from the theme, oros, a bound or limit, or the end of a thing. Hence, the literal signification of the word, used is a fixing before, the bound or limit, of a thing or event. If we look at the connexion, we shall find the idea conveyed by the word fully sustained by its use in these cases. In Rom. viii, 29 and 30. The whole of the Apostle's argument in these and the following verses of this Chap. are in support of the declaration he makes, verse 28; “And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are called according to his purpose.” To this, the enquiry might be made, how, Paul, can we know this? “For, or because,” is the answer, “whom he did foreknow” that is as the objects of his purpose and call, “he did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren.” Did he decree that they should be like Christ, should partake of his image; should, as his brethren participate in that life that is in him, in a justification from the demands of the law, in the Father’s peculiar love and care, in the resurrection, and in that glory which the Father gave him &c. And this was no inefficient purpose, “Moreover whom he did predestinate, them he also called, and whom he called, them he also justified; and whom he justified; them he also glorified.”—Paul, now retorts some enquiries to those, who might doubt the assertion made vs. 28; he asks vs. 31, “what shall we say to these things? If God be for us, who can be against us?” Or more emphatically “who against us,” that is who is it, that is against us?—He goes on to confirm his position by a series of enquiries, in which he shows that the predestination of God, is firm against all the assaults of tribulation or distress &c. and against death and life, and angels and principalities, and powers, and things present, and things to come, and height and depth &c. Thus, we see that the predestination of God, in this case, not only secures the leading purpose, that the Elect shall be conformed to the glorious image of his Son, but also fixes the limits and determines the end of all things which transpire in relation to them. Again if we refer to the use of the word in Eph. we shall find that the predestination, and the determination of purpose of God, go together. Thus Chap. i, verses 4—6, according as he hath chosen us in him, before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love. Having predestinated us to the adoption of children by Jesus Christ, to himself according to the good pleasure of his will,—To the praise of the glory of his grace wherein he hath made us accepted in the beloved. Predestination is here represented to be according to the good pleasure of his will, and is a decreeing of the objects of his choice unto the adoption of children by Christ Jesus, before the foundation of the world; but determines at that early period, their being accepted in the Beloved; and of course decides with certainty, their repenting, believing, and being sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise; things necessarily embraced in their experimental acceptance in Christ. Again in vs. 11th, the Apostle speaks of having obtained an inheritance as the result of that predestination of God which is according to the purpose of him who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will. Here then, we have in these and the connecting verses every part of salvation brought to view as the predestination of God. For he worketh all things, not according to the caprice of fallen men, nor according to any fortuitous circumstances which may transpire, but according to the counsel of his own will. If then it is a fact, as the Apostle declares that God worketh all things after the counsel of his own will, then does the counsel of God’s own will, not only determine with certainty all the parts of salvation and fix the whole chosen race, blameless before him in love in the possession of their inheritance, as heirs of God and joint heirs with Christ, but also decrees the result of all events according to his good pleasure. If all persons with whom we have to do, were disposed, cheerfully to submit to the decision of Divine Revelation, there would be but one question more to decide, in order to determine whether all things, absolutely, or things in a limited sense, are predestinated, or worked according to the decision of the counsel of God’s own will, & that question is,—how far does the government of God extend? If his government extends universally over matter and mind, then there is no movement either of matter or mind but what God works after the counsel of his own will, or determines the result thereof according to the good pleasure of his will. King Nebuchadnezzar evidently thought that God’s Dominion was universal, over Heaven and earth, for he says of him, He doeth according to his will in the army of Heaven, and among the inhabitants of the earth; and none can stay his hand, or say unto him, what doest thou? Dan. iv, 35. And the King was certainly correct in this, for Christ assured his Disciples, Math. xxviii, 18, that all power was given to him in Heaven and in earth; that is as Mediator. If so, God had it in his own hands to give. Again Christ says, John xvii, 2. “As thou hast given him power over all flesh, that he should give eternal life to as many as thou hast given him.” Hence his power is over the wicked as well as over those to whom he gives eternal life: and it being all power, it must extend to both matter and mind, as there can be no disposing influence, or power besides, and therefore, the devices both of men and devils, as well as their actions, must be under his control. Still, however, many persons are unwilling to believe, that the predestination of God has any thing to do with the wicked actions of men or devils. They, in order to be consistent with themselves, ought to believe that wickedness is under the control of an opposite power, and that God exercises no control over wicked actions or thoughts, to limit their extent, or to overrule their results in accordance with his purposes; lest thereby he should be charged with being the author of sin. I think, however, I shall be able to bring from the Scriptures of truth several facts which go to prove that the predestination of God determines the results, fixes the limits, and so controls the actions and devices of wicked men & devils, so as to cause them to terminate in the furtherance of his own glorious purposes. But as I wish not to be tedious, I will leave the further consideration of this subject for another Number.
Tuesday, March 31, 2026
Abel Morgan Biography
Excerpt: Abel Morgan was a Welsh Baptist minister whose life bridged the nonconformist struggles of Wales and the formative years of Baptist life in colonial America. His ministry, translations, and organizational leadership left a durable mark on Welsh Baptist identity and early American Baptist development.
Abel Morgan (1673–1722) was a Welsh Baptist minister renowned for his pastoral leadership, scholarly contributions to Welsh religious literature, and role in establishing Baptist congregations in colonial America. [1] [2]
Born in 1673 at Allt-goch, Cwrtnewydd, in the parish of Llanwenog, Cardiganshire, Wales, Morgan was the son of Morgan Rhydderch, a deacon at the Rhydwilym Baptist church, and brother to Enoch Morgan, who later pastored the Welsh Tract Church in Delaware. [1] [2] From an early age, he joined the Baptist church at Llanwenarth in the Abergavenny district, where he began preaching in 1692 at the age of 19. [1] By 1696 or 1697, he accepted a call to pastor the church at Blaenau Gwent in Monmouthshire, though he was not formally ordained until 1700. [1] [2] Influenced by the Calvinistic theology and Puritan sentiments of 17th-century Welsh Baptist pioneers, Morgan emphasized Reformed doctrine, congregational singing, expositional preaching, and strict church discipline during his ministry in Wales. [2]
In September 1711, Morgan emigrated to America at the invitation of his brother Enoch, enduring a perilous 22-week voyage that claimed the lives of his first wife, Priscilla Powell, and their infant son; he arrived in Philadelphia on February 14, 1712. He had a son and daughter from his first marriage. [1] [2] He soon became the sixth pastor of the Pennepek Baptist Church (also known as Lower Dublin), the oldest surviving Baptist congregation in Pennsylvania, founded in 1688, resolving internal divisions through his leadership and serving until his death. [2] As an itinerant preacher, he organized churches in southeast Pennsylvania, Delaware valleys, and New Jersey, including establishing a congregation at Cape May, and contributed to the Philadelphia Baptist Association (PBA), the first such body in America, founded in 1707, by promoting ministerial education and associational cooperation. [2]
Morgan married twice more after arriving in America: first to Martha Burrows in November 1714 (who died the following October), and then to the widow Judith Gooding (née Griffiths) in 1717, with whom he had four children. [1] [2] His scholarly output preserved Welsh Baptist traditions amid English assimilation; he translated the Westminster Shorter Catechism and the Century Confession (based on the 1689 London Confession) into Welsh, drafted church covenants, and produced Cyd-goriad Egwyddorawl o'r Scrythurau (1730), the first Biblical concordance in Welsh and the second Welsh book printed in the United States, published posthumously by his brother Enoch. [1] [2] These works advanced Calvinistic ecclesiology, family catechizing, and doctrinal instruction among Welsh immigrants. [2]
Morgan died on December 16, 1722, in Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania, at age 49, and was buried at the Pennepack Baptist Church Cemetery before his remains were reinterred at Mount Moriah Cemetery. [1] [2] His legacy endures through his family's continued ministerial roles, including his nephew Abel Morgan Jr., and his foundational influence on American Baptist organization, evangelism, and confessional standards, including elements of the 1742 Philadelphia Confession derived from his manuscripts. [2]
Early Life in Wales
Birth and Family Origins
Abel Morgan was born in 1673 at Allt-goch, Cwrtnewydd, in the parish of Llanwenog, Cardiganshire, Wales. [1] His father, Morgan Rhydderch (also known as Morgan Roderick), was a prominent figure in the local Baptist community, having united with the Rhydwilym Baptist church during a period of violent persecutions and been elected deacon there in 1668, with ordination following in 1669. [3] Morgan Rhydderch's early death around 1680 left his widow, Jane, to remarry John Griffith, who became stepfather to Abel and his siblings, including younger brother Enoch Morgan (born 1676). [4]
The Morgan family exemplified the Nonconformist Baptist heritage in 17th-century Wales, descending from a line of religious leaders influenced by Puritan sentiments and Calvinistic theology. [2] Rhydwilym, established in 1668 under William Jones, represented a key hub for early Welsh Baptists practicing close communion and adherence to the 1689 Second London Confession of Faith, amid broader associations linking churches across South Wales. [2] This familial commitment to Baptist principles occurred against the backdrop of post-Restoration religious tensions, including the enforcement of the Act of Uniformity (1662) and Conventicle Act (1664), which suppressed dissenting worship and prompted many Nonconformists to convene secretly in rural settings. [3]
In rural Cardiganshire, a region dominated by pastoral agriculture, families like the Morgans balanced modest farming livelihoods with devout religious observance, fostering an environment where early exposure to Baptist preaching shaped young lives. [1]
Religious Education and Influences
Abel Morgan's early religious formation was deeply rooted in the nonconformist Baptist traditions of Wales, shaped primarily through his family's longstanding ties to local churches. His father, Morgan Rhydderch, served as a deacon at the Rhydwilym Baptist church from 1668 and was ordained in 1669, providing Morgan with informal immersion in Baptist principles from childhood in Cardiganshire. [1] This environment exposed him to core doctrines such as Calvinistic theology and the 1689 Second London Confession of Faith, which the Rhydwilym Association emphasized by requiring churches to affirm it biannually. [2]
Upon moving to the Abergavenny district in his youth, Morgan joined the Baptist church at Llanwenarth, where he encountered influential figures and communities upholding Welsh nonconformist theology amid growing religious tensions. The church, part of the broader network of Particular Baptist congregations, reinforced practices like believer's baptism and church covenants, drawing from seventeenth-century pioneers such as John Miles and Jenkin Jones. These influences fostered his commitment to Baptist ecclesiology, including close communion and local church autonomy, within a family legacy that included his brother Enoch, who later became a minister. [1]
Around age 19 in 1692, Morgan underwent a personal conversion that led to his baptism and deepened dedication to Baptist convictions, marking the onset of his spiritual maturity before formal ministry. [2] This awakening aligned with the fervent, Puritan-influenced piety of Welsh Baptists, solidifying his rejection of infant baptism in favor of adult immersion as a public testimony of faith. [2]
Ministry and Persecution in Wales
Ordination and Early Preaching
Abel Morgan began his preaching career in the early 1690s as a young member of the Baptist church at Llanwenarth, near Abergavenny in Monmouthshire, where he delivered initial sermons emphasizing nonconformist principles and the authority of scripture within Welsh Baptist communities. [1] Born in Llanwenog, Cardiganshire, Morgan's early ministry drew on his familial ties to nonconformist traditions, as his father, Morgan Rhydderch, had been ordained in the Baptist church at Rhydwilym in 1669. [1]
By 1696, Morgan received a call to serve the newly formed Baptist congregation at Blaenau Gwent in Monmouthshire, marking a significant step in his formal ministry among small, scattered Welsh Baptist groups. [5] His ordination as a Baptist minister occurred in 1700, solidifying his role as a preacher focused on scriptural exposition and the defense of Baptist doctrines amid broader religious nonconformity in Wales. [1]
During this period, Morgan established key connections within the Welsh Baptist network, which helped elevate his standing in Baptist leadership and facilitated collaborative efforts in preaching and church organization across Monmouthshire congregations. [6] These early assignments involved itinerant preaching at modest gatherings, where he addressed themes of personal faith, scriptural fidelity, and communal resilience in the face of nonconformist challenges. [1]
Challenges Under Welsh Laws
As a Baptist minister in late 17th- and early 18th-century Wales, Abel Morgan operated amid severe religious restrictions imposed by the established Church of England, particularly through the Act of Uniformity (1662), which required all ministers to conform to Anglican practices and ejected nonconformists from parishes, and the Conventicle Act (1664), which prohibited gatherings of more than five people for worship outside the Anglican framework. These laws led to widespread fines, imprisonment, and property seizures for Baptists, who were targeted for their practices of believer's baptism by immersion and unlicensed preaching; enforcement was especially harsh during the Restoration period under Charles II (1660–1685), resulting in threats of violence and forced secrecy for nonconformist assemblies.
Morgan's congregations, including Llanwenarth Baptist Church (established 1652) where he served as an assistant preacher, and Blaenau Gwent (a branch from Llanwenarth established around 1660, with early meetings at sites like Tŷ Nest Llewellyn, where he became pastor following his 1696 call), endured direct harassment from Anglican authorities. [7] [8] Members were frequently dragged before magistrates for participating in nonconformist meetings, with surveillance by local clergy and officials in Monmouthshire, where Morgan preached, intensifying scrutiny and compelling the group to hold worship in private homes, fields, woods, and mountains to evade raids and arrests. Records of personal fines or imprisonment for Morgan himself are not detailed.
Despite these adversities, Welsh Baptists demonstrated remarkable resilience, sustaining underground networks of preachers and safe houses to preserve their faith, a context in which Morgan played a key role by traveling extensively to preach and support scattered congregations in Monmouthshire and beyond. His efforts helped maintain unity and growth, as seen in the expansion of Blaenau Gwent under his leadership, where he was "very well received and much respected" amid ongoing threats; these networks involved shifting meeting locations weekly, posting sentinels, and avoiding singing to prevent detection, enabling Baptists to baptize new members and organize despite the legal prohibitions. Morgan's farewell charge to Blaenau Gwent in 1711 emphasized perseverance in doctrine and mutual support, reflecting the enduring spirit of resistance that carried into his later American ministry.
Emigration to America
Motivations and Journey
Abel Morgan's decision to emigrate from Wales to America in 1711 was driven by the broader context of religious persecution faced by nonconformist Baptists in Wales, where strict laws under the Church of England limited their ability to worship freely and preach openly. As a prominent Baptist minister, Morgan sought a more tolerant environment for his faith, aligning with the wave of Welsh Baptist migrations to Pennsylvania, which promised political and spiritual liberty under William Penn's Quaker-influenced colony. Additionally, invitations from established Welsh Baptist communities in America, including a formal call in 1709 from the Pennepek Baptist Church near Philadelphia—verified through correspondence with Pennsylvania acquaintances—played a key role in his resolve, encouraging him to relocate with his congregation's blessing from Blaenau Gwent in Monmouthshire. [2] [1]
Morgan departed from Bristol, England, in late September 1711 aboard an unnamed vessel bound for Philadelphia, accompanied by his wife Priscilla Powell, their infant son, and young daughter Jane, as part of a group of Welsh Baptists fleeing similar hardships. The transatlantic crossing lasted approximately eleven weeks of active sailing, though the total journey extended to about twenty-two weeks due to repeated delays from adverse weather, including a stop in Ireland, during which the ship twice sought safe harbor. Traveling with family and fellow believers underscored the communal nature of the migration, building on earlier Welsh Baptist settlements like the one his brother Enoch helped establish in 1701 at the Welsh Tract in Delaware. [2] [1] [9]
The voyage proved perilous, marked by relentless storms that battered the ship and exposed passengers to the era's typical transatlantic hazards, including disease, malnutrition, and the constant threat of shipwreck. Tragically, Morgan's wife and infant son succumbed to the rigors of the journey, likely due to illness exacerbated by the harsh conditions, leaving him to arrive in Philadelphia on February 14, 1712, widowed and grieving with his daughter Jane amid the relief of reaching American shores. Such challenges were emblematic of the high risks borne by early 18th-century emigrants, where mortality rates on similar crossings often exceeded 10-20 percent. [2] [1]
Arrival and Initial Settlement
Abel Morgan arrived in Philadelphia on February 14, 1712, following a protracted and storm-battered voyage that began in September 1711 and lasted over five months with multiple harbor stops. [2] [1] During the journey, Morgan endured profound personal losses, including the deaths of his first wife, Priscilla Powell, and their infant son, leaving him to continue with his young daughter Jane. [2] [10]
Upon landing, Morgan was welcomed into the close-knit Welsh Baptist communities that had taken root in the region over the preceding decade, bolstered by earlier immigrants who had fled religious persecution in Wales. [2] His brother Enoch, who had arrived in Philadelphia in September 1701 aboard the ship James and Mary as part of a group of sixteen Welsh settlers led by Rev. Thomas Griffith, provided a vital familial anchor; Enoch had initially settled in the Pennepek area before relocating to the Welsh Tract near New Castle, Delaware, eighteen months later, where he became a preacher and pastor. [2] [10] These networks, comprising both Baptist and broader Welsh immigrant families, offered immediate support amid the challenges of colonial establishment. [2]
Morgan's initial settlement occurred in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, where he quickly established connections with the Pennepek Baptist Church, joining as a member amid its internal disputes and contributing to its stabilization through his preaching and counsel, drawing on the Welsh traditions of expositional ministry and church discipline familiar to the congregation's scattered Welsh membership. [2] He maintained ties to the Welsh Tract area through his brother Enoch and other kin. This early integration laid the groundwork for his sustained involvement in the Philadelphia Baptist Association, fostering unity among dispersed congregations in Pennsylvania, Delaware, and New Jersey. [2]
American Ministry and Contributions
Pastoral Roles in Pennsylvania
Upon his arrival in Pennsylvania in February 1712, Abel Morgan assumed the role of pastor at the Pennepek Baptist Church (also known as the Lower Dublin Baptist Church), located near Philadelphia, succeeding earlier leaders including the church's founder, Elias Keach. [2] [11] This appointment, which followed a call extended to him in 1709, addressed ongoing leadership disputes within the congregation and marked the beginning of his decade-long tenure until his death in 1722. [1] As the oldest surviving Baptist church in Pennsylvania, founded in 1688, Pennepek served a scattered membership drawn from Welsh immigrants and local settlers across eastern Pennsylvania and New Jersey, with collective meetings held only biannually. [2]
Morgan's daily ministerial duties centered on preaching the Word with expository fervor, delivering sermons in both Welsh and English to preserve cultural and doctrinal ties for the immigrant community while reaching English-speaking members. [2] He administered key ordinances such as believer's baptism by immersion and the laying on of hands, emphasizing Baptist distinctives like church covenants, psalm-singing, and anointing the sick with oil. [2] Additionally, he provided pastoral counseling through guidance on church discipline, mutual faithfulness, and ministerial support, helping to foster unity and doctrinal purity amid the challenges of frontier life. [2]
Beyond Pennepek, Morgan expanded his influence by assisting at the First Baptist Church of Philadelphia, organized in 1698 but still linked to Pennepek until 1746, where he supported immigrant integration by promoting Welsh Baptist customs and resolving inter-church tensions. [2] [12] His itinerant preaching extended to nearby areas in Pennsylvania and New Jersey, including Hopewell and Montgomery, aiding in the establishment of daughter congregations and reinforcing community bonds for new arrivals. [2]
Role in Baptist Organization
Abel Morgan played a significant role in the early development and strengthening of Baptist organizational structures in colonial America, particularly through his leadership in the Philadelphia Baptist Association (PBA), the first sustained Baptist association in the New World, established in 1707. Arriving in Pennsylvania in 1712, Morgan quickly became involved in resolving internal disputes at the Pennepek Baptist Church via PBA mediation, serving as its pastor from 1712 until his death and helping to stabilize it as a central hub for the association's activities. He promoted associational governance modeled on Welsh Baptist traditions, emphasizing advisory cooperation among churches to maintain local autonomy while fostering doctrinal unity and mutual support, such as in itinerant preaching and church planting efforts in regions like Cape May, New Jersey, and Hopewell, Pennsylvania. As a frequent moderator of PBA meetings, Morgan advocated for "regularity" in church order, influencing the association's shift toward terms like "advice" and "mutual agreement" over more authoritative language in handling disputes. [13] [2]
Morgan's writings further advanced Baptist unity amid the challenges of a diverse colonial landscape dominated by Quakers in Pennsylvania. He drafted confessional documents, including a Welsh adaptation of the Century Confession (based on the 1689 Second London Confession with additions on practices like laying on of hands and psalm singing), which members of the Welsh Tract Church signed and which informed the PBA's 1742 Philadelphia Confession of Faith. These works, along with circular letters contributed to PBA minutes, promoted Calvinistic theology and countered emerging Arminian influences, helping to solidify orthodox Baptist identity across scattered congregations. Additionally, Morgan translated the Westminster Shorter Catechism into Welsh to encourage family-based religious education, reinforcing doctrinal cohesion in immigrant communities. [13] [2]
In mentoring emerging leaders, Morgan emphasized the cultivation of ministerial gifts, directing PBA churches in 1722 to identify promising young men for advanced training, such as at Thomas Hollis's academy, which laid foundational steps for Baptist education in America. He particularly influenced his nephew, Abel Morgan Jr. (1713–1785), who followed family tradition by becoming a prominent Regular Baptist pastor at Middletown Church and continuing advocacy for Welsh Baptist orthodoxy. Morgan also championed Welsh-language services to preserve cultural and religious heritage among immigrants, preaching primarily in Welsh at churches like Welsh Tract and translating key texts to prevent assimilation into English-dominated practices, though English services gradually prevailed by the mid-18th century. These efforts ensured the endurance of distinct Baptist customs in the face of colonial pluralism. [13] [2]
Later Years, Death, and Legacy
Final Activities and Death
In the early 1720s, Abel Morgan persisted in his pastoral responsibilities at the Pennepek Baptist Church near Philadelphia, where he had served since 1712, while also undertaking itinerant preaching and contributing to the expansion of Baptist congregations in Pennsylvania and New Jersey. [2] His activities included regular ministry at churches such as Hopewell and Montgomery, as well as promoting Calvinistic doctrines, church discipline, and the preservation of Welsh Baptist traditions through translations and educational efforts. [2] Notably, Morgan translated key confessional documents, including a Welsh version of the Century Confession adapted from the 1689 Second London Confession, which influenced the Philadelphia Baptist Association's later standards. [2]
During the 1722 meeting of the Philadelphia Baptist Association, Morgan actively supported initiatives to identify promising young individuals for ministerial training, recommending them to an academy funded by London Baptist merchant Thomas Hollis to bolster future leadership among American Baptists. [2] This reflected his ongoing commitment to organizational development and education within the denomination, though it did not lead to immediate institutional outcomes. [2]
Abel Morgan died on December 16, 1722, in Philadelphia at the age of 49. [1] [2] He was originally buried at the Pennepack Baptist Church Cemetery, but his remains were reinterred in 1768 at the First Baptist Church burial ground in Philadelphia and then moved in 1860 to the First Baptist Church plot at Mount Moriah Cemetery. [12] Following his death, several of his unpublished works, including a Welsh Bible concordance titled Cydgordiad Egwyddorawl o'r Scrythurau , were edited and published posthumously by his brother Enoch Morgan in 1730, ensuring the continuation of his theological influence. [2] [14]
Family and Personal Life
Abel Morgan married his first wife, Priscilla Powell, in Wales sometime before 1711; together they had two children, a daughter named Jane and an unnamed son. [2] [15] The family emigrated from Wales to Pennsylvania in September 1711 aboard a ship from Bristol, enduring severe storms and delays that extended the voyage to twenty-two weeks, during which Priscilla and their infant son perished at sea, leaving Jane to arrive with her father in Philadelphia on February 14, 1712. [2] [4]
In America, Morgan remarried twice: first to Martha Burrows in 1714, who died less than a year later without issue, and then to the widow Judith Gooding Griffith on March 7, 1717, with whom he fathered four children—Rachel, Abel Jr., Samuel, and Enoch—resulting in at least five surviving offspring overall when including Jane. [2] [9] [16] Child-rearing in the colonial Welsh settlements of Pennsylvania proved challenging amid harsh frontier conditions, religious community pressures, and the need to balance ministerial duties with family needs, yet Morgan integrated his household into Baptist life. [2]
Morgan was proficient in both Welsh and English, preaching and writing in Welsh to preserve his cultural and religious heritage among immigrants while adapting to English-speaking contexts in America. [2] His devotion to family-integrated worship was evident in his translation of the Westminster Shorter Catechism into Welsh, which included specific admonitions for parents to catechize their children at home, emphasizing religious instruction as a familial duty. [2] He briefly mentored his son, Abel Morgan Jr., who later became a prominent Baptist pastor. [2]
Legacy
Morgan's legacy includes his foundational role in American Baptist organization, evangelism, and confessional standards. Elements of the 1742 Philadelphia Confession were derived from his manuscripts, and his family's continued ministerial roles—such as those of his son Abel Jr. and other descendants—extended his influence across Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and beyond. His works preserved Welsh Baptist traditions and promoted Calvinistic ecclesiology among immigrants. [2]
Endnotes
- https://biography.wales/article/s-MORG-ABE-1673 ↩︎a ↩︎b ↩︎c ↩︎d ↩︎e ↩︎f ↩︎g ↩︎h ↩︎i ↩︎j ↩︎k ↩︎l ↩︎m ↩︎n ↩︎o ↩︎p ↩︎q ↩︎r ↩︎s ↩︎t ↩︎u ↩︎v
- https://baptisthistoryhomepage.com/morgan.abel.by.priest.html ↩︎a ↩︎b ↩︎c ↩︎d ↩︎e ↩︎f ↩︎g ↩︎h ↩︎i ↩︎j ↩︎k ↩︎l ↩︎m ↩︎n ↩︎o ↩︎p ↩︎q ↩︎r ↩︎s ↩︎t ↩︎u ↩︎v ↩︎w ↩︎x ↩︎y ↩︎z ↩︎aa ↩︎ab ↩︎ac ↩︎ad ↩︎ae ↩︎af ↩︎ag ↩︎ah ↩︎ai ↩︎aj ↩︎ak ↩︎al ↩︎am ↩︎an ↩︎ao ↩︎ap ↩︎aq ↩︎ar ↩︎as ↩︎at ↩︎au ↩︎av ↩︎aw ↩︎ax ↩︎ay ↩︎az
- https://baptisthistoryhomepage.com/morgan.abel.appleton.enclo.html ↩︎a ↩︎b
- https://robertsongenealogy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Abel-Morgan-Life-and-Family.pdf ↩︎a ↩︎b
- https://www.jstor.org/stable/20084561 ↩︎
- https://www.reformedreader.org/history/ivey/ch08.htm ↩︎
- https://www.nationalchurchestrust.org/church/llanwenarth-baptist-church-govilon ↩︎
- https://outoftheblueartifacts.com/blaenau-gwent-baptist-movement-and-chapel-ty-nest-llewellyn/ ↩︎
- https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Morgan-1170 ↩︎a ↩︎b
- http://enoch-morgan.blogspot.com/2016/01/ ↩︎a ↩︎b
- https://www.reformedreader.org/history/early.philadelphia.baptists.chapter4.htm ↩︎
- https://friendsofmountmoriahcemetery.org/about/notable-burials/14549/ ↩︎a ↩︎b
- https://dbts.edu/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/The-Abel-Morgans-Contribution-to-Baptist-Ecclesiology-Priest.pdf ↩︎a ↩︎b ↩︎c
- https://openlibrary.org/works/OL234903W/Cyd-gordiad_egwyddorawl_o%27r_Scrythurau ↩︎
- https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/15767641/abel-morgan ↩︎
- https://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/LY2W-4M8/abel-morgan-1673-1722 ↩︎
Prepared for Blogger from the uploaded Grokipedia page on Abel Morgan, with site navigation and interface elements removed for publication use. Endnotes are now linked both ways.
Monday, March 30, 2026
Sunday, March 29, 2026
1833 SIGNS OF THE TIMES (BEEBE)
Friday, March 27, 2026
SIGNS OF THE TIMES 1833 (EXCERPT)
...the hidden things of dishonesty; can only be appreciated by those who have been taught in the Old School of Christ, whose souls have been sickened with the specious doctrines which prevail to such an alarming extent in our land.
Thursday, March 26, 2026
Wednesday, March 25, 2026
ANTI-MISSION BAPTISTS (Trott)
As I was taking a peep at a short time since at the paper entitled the “World as it is,” I discovered some things worthy of being noticed in the Signs of the Times. In the World of Oct. 6th, there is an article taken from the Pioneer, of which I will give you a part as it stands:
Tuesday, March 24, 2026
Monday, March 23, 2026
AB GOLDSMITH ON CHURCH COUNCILS (Santamaria)
COMMUNICATIONS.
FOR THE SIGNS OF THE TIMES.
In a former communication, I proposed to consider some errors which have crept in among the Baptists, ten of which were named as principal errors, and to each of which special regard was to be paid in a particular and separate paper, and first in order stood “Ecclesiastical Councils.” These bodies have of late assumed an importance and consequence in Church Legislation, which ought to alarm every friend to Gospel order, and cause an immediate and serious inquiry among the sons of Zion, for the “Old Paths” and the “Good Way,” with an accompanying determination to walk therein, when found. They originated in their present form in the corruption of the Church in early ages, and received a great proportion of their importance from the royal sanction of Constantine, when he solemnized the Marriage of “Church and State.” It is not necessary at this time to specify the particular Councils, which at different times have set, to dictate laws to Zion, or Babylon, to make Creeds and confessions of faith,—by which to make and punish Heretics. Our object is not to amend or reform them, but to destroy them, or prove that they ought to be destroyed, at least in their present form. The only way then is to appeal to the old statute book, which, like the Book of the Law in king Josiah’s days, seems to be hid in the rubbish, and look for what is there written; and if the modern proceedings will not compare therewith, let us reject the inventions of men and obey the law of the Lord.
Sunday, March 22, 2026
HEBREWS 2.5-11 (Santamaria)
Some passages feel like thunder rolling across the page—slow at first, then suddenly splitting the sky open. Hebrews 2:5–9 is one of them. It takes the whole architecture of reality—angels, humanity, dominion, suffering, glory—and rearranges it around one blazing center: a Man crowned with glory who first wore thorns.
Saturday, March 21, 2026
Entertaining Angels Unawares (Santamaria)
There is something at once beautiful and unsettling in the command of Hebrews 13:2: “Be not forgetful to entertain strangers: for thereby some have entertained angels unawares.” It is one of those verses that opens a window for a moment, lets in a gust of heaven, and then leaves us standing there wondering how many ordinary moments were not ordinary at all.
Friday, March 20, 2026
Jesus, the Only Begotten Son of God (Santamaria)
There are truths in Holy Scripture that stand like mountains above the landscape of revelation. Men may wander around them, deny them, rename them, or try to chip them into something smaller, but still they rise. One of those truths is this: Jesus Christ is the only begotten Son of God. This is not a decorative phrase, not a soft religious title, not a poetic flourish added by devout men. It is part of the very marrow of the Christian confession. “Whosoever shall confess that Jesus is the Son of God, God dwelleth in him, and he in God” (1 John 4:15). John wrote his Gospel “that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through his name” (John 20:31). Take away the Son as Scripture presents Him, and the gospel is not merely weakened; it is gutted.
Thursday, March 19, 2026
Wednesday, March 18, 2026
When the Perfect Comes: A Fuller Reading of 1 Corinthians 13:8–13
There are passages in Scripture that seem, at first glance, so simple that one wonders why they have caused such controversy. First Corinthians 13:10 is one of them: “But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away.” Yet around that single line, whole systems have been built, arguments sharpened, and theories defended with more confidence than the text itself will bear. Some have said “that which is perfect” is the completed New Testament canon. Others have said it is the mature condition of the church. Still others have taken it, more broadly and more naturally, as the final state of perfection into which the saints enter at the return of Christ. The question is not trivial. Paul’s point touches not only spiritual gifts, but the entire contrast between the church’s present partial condition and her future fullness.1
Tuesday, March 17, 2026
Monday, March 16, 2026
Sunday, March 15, 2026
Saturday, March 14, 2026
Shall We Know Our Loved Ones in Heaven (Santamaria)
This article presents both the pros and the cons of this idea. Since some are orthodox who hold different positions on this matter, we let the reader evaluate with the guidance of the Spirit, which he is persuade A Biblical Meditation on Recognition, Reunion, and the Glory to Come Few questions press more deeply upon the human heart than this one: Will we know those we loved when we are with the Lord? Will the mother know the child she buried? Will the husband know the wife with whom he walked through tears and prayer? Will faithful friends in Christ, long separated by death, stand together again in full and holy joy?Shall We Know Our Loved Ones in Heaven?
Friday, March 13, 2026
Thursday, March 12, 2026
DR. JECKYLL AND MR. HYDE (Santamaria)
Stevenson doesn’t really begin Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde with a monster. He begins with respectability—clean streets, clean names, clean dinner conversation—and with a door that shouldn’t be there.
Wednesday, March 11, 2026
Tuesday, March 10, 2026
I Shall Not Die, But Live: Psalm 118:17 and the Unconquerable Life in Christ (Santamaria)
Psalm 118:17 stands as one of the most defiant declarations in Scripture: "I shall not die, but live, and declare the works of the LORD" (KJV). In Hebrew, לֹא־אָמוּת כִּי־אֶחְיֶה וַאֲסַפֵּר מַעֲשֵׂי־יָהּ (loʾ ʾāmût kî ʾeḥyeh waʾă Sappēr maʿăśê-Yah). This verse pulses with raw vitality—a survivor's cry rising from death's shadow, a vow to testify amid peril. It is no mere sentiment; it is battle-tested faith forged in the crucible of suffering, echoing through millennia to every soul facing mortality's sting. Today, in a world of pandemics, wars, and personal despair, Psalm 118:17 confronts us: Will you claim unconquerable life, or surrender to fear?
Monday, March 9, 2026
DELIVER US FROM EVIL (Santamaria)
“Deliver us from evil” is one of those prayers that sounds simple until you realize it’s the sound a drowning man makes when he finally stops pretending he can swim.
Sunday, March 8, 2026
"Exhortations" in the Bible (Santamaria)
Modern evangelical talk about “exhortations” often smuggles in a whole theory of the Christian life: God saves you by grace, and then (so the story goes) He progressively sanctifies you by piling up commands, spiritual disciplines, and “steps of obedience,” until you slowly become holier in the same way a rock becomes a statue—chip, chip, chip—assuming you keep cooperating.
Saturday, March 7, 2026
THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HOLINESS AND SANCTIFICATION (Santamaria)
Holiness and sanctification in the New Testament are not two unrelated ideas that happen to share religious perfume. They are members of the same Greek word-family, built on one bright root: ἁγ-. If you understand that family—how its nouns, verbs, and adjectives behave—you’ll stop treating “holiness” as a vague mood and “sanctification” as a mystical self-improvement program. You’ll start hearing the New Testament’s own emphasis: God marks off what is His, and what is His must not be treated as common.
Friday, March 6, 2026
We Do Know What To Pray For (Santamaria)
Prayer is one of the places where a man finds out, in the most personal way possible, that God is God and he is not. In theory, everybody agrees with that. In practice, we are all tempted to treat prayer like a lever: pull it correctly, and heaven must move. Or we treat it like a performance: say it well enough, and the room will feel spiritual. Or we treat it like a duty: do it because we’re supposed to, and hope God counts it as something.
Thursday, March 5, 2026
"Even your santification (Santamaria)
The phrase you’re aiming at is from 1 Thessalonians 4:3 (KJV): “For this is the will of God, even your sanctification…” In a lot of modern preaching, that line gets turned into a banner for “progressive sanctification” as a kind of spiritual staircase—your holiness steadily increasing measurably, until your growth becomes the quiet proof that God accepts you.
Wednesday, March 4, 2026
FROM GLORY TO GLORY (Santamaria)
“For glory to glory” is one of those phrases that can get hijacked by the spiritual self-improvement industry. People hear it and imagine a sanctification ladder: rung one, rung two, rung three—getting holier in a measurable, upward-only way, until you finally become the Christian you were “supposed” to be.
But Paul is not selling a ladder. He’s breaking a veil.
Tuesday, March 3, 2026
The phrase you’re aiming at is from 1 Thessalonians 4:3 (KJV): “For this is the will of God, even your sanctification…” In a lot of modern preaching, that line gets turned into a banner for “progressive sanctification” as a kind of spiritual staircase—your holiness steadily increasing measurably, until your growth becomes the quiet proof that God accepts you.











