Translate
Historic
Historic
Showing posts with label New Birth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New Birth. Show all posts
Thursday, October 31, 2024
THE BIRTH OF THE NEW MAN AND ADOPTION OF THE OLD MAN Or, The “Soul of Man” is not the New Man, nor the subject of Regeneration (DUDLEY) 1853
Dearly Beloved Brethren,
In our youth, we were taught to seek instruction from those sources which time and improved opportunities, had rendered most competent to impart it. As we have increased in years, our desire to know the truth as it is in Christ Jesus, has increased.
Friday, October 11, 2024
THE NEW BIRTH (DUDLEY) 1868
The word of God teaches, “That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit” (John 3:3).
Saturday, March 2, 2024
Tuesday, December 5, 2023
JOHN 3.5 (BEEBE)
In reply to brother John W. Henley, of Georgia.
“Jesus answered and said, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.”
Sunday, May 14, 2023
Monday, May 1, 2023
REGENERATION DOES NOT EQUAL THE NEW BIRTH 2
Elder Johnson was criticized for his first article. Here he defends his view with more details - ed.
Sunday, April 30, 2023
REGENERATION DOES NOT EQUAL THE NEW BIRTH
This is a common mistake among Christians to conflate regeneration with the New Birth. The implications of this conflation are vast - ed.
Friday, March 10, 2023
Thursday, March 9, 2023
Monday, August 27, 2018
SOT: REGENERATION NOT THE NEW BIRTH....
Since the publication of brother J. F. Johnson's communication on the subject of regeneration, we have received several letters from brethren, some approving and others querying as to the correctness of his position.
Saturday, August 11, 2018
SOT: BORN OF THE SPIRIT...
Lexington, Ky., March, 1880.
Saturday, July 21, 2018
BANNER OF HOPE: QUESTION ON BORN ANEW...
Question on “Born Anew”
On page 9, top paragraph, he mentions the “sinner born again theory.” By this does he mean the belief by Arminians and psuedo-calvinists that the sinner must choose to be born again, rather than a work of the Holy Spirit alone? If so then I understand. If not, I am at a loss here.
On same page he says “that such a commandment, in the peculiar sense in which they were given, were addressed to all men.” I don’t understand what he means at all.
I would appreciate (again) your help.
In Hope,
March 19, 2010
Dear Elder Chet,
I read Elder Smoot’s article several times,and got more out of it each time. Excellent!
I read Elder Smoot’s article several times,and got more out of it each time. Excellent!
Just two questions if I may ask.
On page 9, top paragraph, he mentions the “sinner born again theory.” By this does he mean the belief by Arminians and psuedo-calvinists that the sinner must choose to be born again, rather than a work of the Holy Spirit alone? If so then I understand. If not, I am at a loss here.
On same page he says “that such a commandment, in the peculiar sense in which they were given, were addressed to all men.” I don’t understand what he means at all.
I would appreciate (again) your help.
In Hope,
March 19, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)