INFRASTRUCTURE IN DOCTRINES
Contents
- FOREWORD
- INTRODUCTION
- HEBREWS 6.1-2
- SO WHAT ARE THE IMPORTANT DOCTRINES IN ORDER?
- WHAT WERE THE OPINIONS OF BEEBE & TROTT ON THE IMPORTANCE OF ESCATAOLOGY
x
Contributions: Elder Respess was a regular contributor to The Primitive Baptist paper, which was a major publication for the Old School Primitive Baptist community. He wrote extensively on salvation, church governance, and the Christian walk.
Key Focus: Much of his writing emphasized the importance of obedience and faithfulness in the Christian life, while affirming God’s sovereign grace in salvation.
Summary: This work delves into the concept of God's Kingdom, focusing on the spiritual reign of Christ in the hearts of believers.
Key Themes:
The nature of Christ’s kingdom as a spiritual and invisible kingdom.
Obedience as a central aspect of life in God's kingdom.
The relationship between church life and the Kingdom of God.
Summary: In this book, Respess outlines his views on the difference between Absolute predestination (God’s sovereign election) and Conditional Time Salvation (obedience and faithfulness for temporal blessings).
Key Themes:
Eternal salvation is unconditional (solely by grace).
Time salvation (blessings in this life) is conditional on the believer's obedience to God’s Word.
Explores the doctrinal division between Absoluters and Conditionalists within the Primitive Baptist movement.
Summary: This treatise emphasizes the relationship between grace, faith, and works in the believer’s walk.
Key Themes:
The role of faith as the channel of grace.
Obedience and good works as the fruit of salvation.
The proper understanding of grace that leads to a godly life.
Summary: Elder Respess elaborates on the Biblical doctrine of election, with a strong emphasis on God’s sovereign choice in salvation.
Key Themes:
The eternal election of the saints by God's grace.
Election is unconditional; however, experiential salvation depends on the believer's obedience.
Summary: In this work, Respess discusses the Great Commission given by Christ in Matthew 28, emphasizing the church’s role in carrying out the gospel mandate.
Key Themes:
Evangelistic duty of the church to preach and baptize.
Importance of church discipline and maintaining godly order.
Summary: A significant work where Respess outlines his views on the sovereignty of God, especially in the context of salvation.
Key Themes:
God’s absolute control over salvation and eternal life.
Emphasis on the unconditional nature of salvation, affirming God's grace.
The relationship between sovereignty and free will, in which free will is acknowledged but God’s plan prevails.
Summary: In this work, Respess defends the historic teachings of the Primitive Baptists and urges adherence to biblical doctrines that were passed down through the church.
Key Themes:
The preservation of biblical faith through the generations.
Importance of staying true to the teachings of the apostles.
A defense of Primitive Baptist tradition and its distinctive beliefs.
Summary: Respess examines Christ's earthly mission, focusing on the purpose of His coming and the nature of His work.
Key Themes:
Christ’s work as Redeemer and Savior.
The spiritual transformation that believers undergo in Christ.
Christ’s sacrifice and its implications for the believer’s life.
In addition to these specific works, Elder J.R. Respess also contributed to various sermons, articles, and periodicals throughout his life, particularly in the publications of the Primitive Baptist denomination. Many of his writings emphasized the sovereignty of God, the importance of Scripture, and the necessity of faith and obedience for experiencing God's blessings in this life, while affirming that eternal salvation was always by grace alone.
The question of whether Jewish priests (Levites or Aaronic) were circumcised while in Egypt is an important one, particularly because of Joshua 5:5, which states:
"All the people who came out of Egypt were circumcised, but all the people born in the wilderness during the journey from Egypt had not been circumcised." (Joshua 5:5, NIV)
This suggests that those who came out of Egypt, including Moses, Aaron, and the priests, were circumcised. Let’s break this down into historical, textual, and theological evidence:
Exodus 4:24–26 records the incident where God sought to kill Moses for not circumcising his son. Zipporah then circumcised the child and averted judgment.
This passage implies that circumcision was still expected and enforced by God, even in the period following Egyptian slavery.
Moses’ failure to circumcise his own son seems to be an exception, not the rule, and may reflect the influence of his Midianite marriage rather than Israelite custom.
No passage in the Old Testament ever indicates that Aaron or the Levitical priests were uncircumcised.
In fact, participation in the Passover was strictly limited to the circumcised only (Exodus 12:48):
“No uncircumcised person shall eat of it.”
Aaron and the priests participated in the original Passover in Egypt (Exodus 12), which confirms that they had to be circumcised to partake.
Thus, logically:
Only circumcised males could partake of the Passover (Ex. 12:48)
Aaron and Moses partook of the Passover
→ Therefore, Aaron and Moses were circumcised
Levitical and Aaronic duties, once instituted in the wilderness (Exodus–Leviticus), assumed a pure lineage and obedience to covenantal signs.
Since God chose Aaron and his sons for the priesthood, they would not have been allowed to serve while in an uncircumcised state.
Ezekiel 44:7 (later, during exile) criticizes priests who allowed the uncircumcised in heart and flesh into God's sanctuary—implying that both external and internal circumcision were expected.
Rabbinic sources (e.g., Midrash Rabbah, Mekhilta de-Rabbi Ishmael) affirm that circumcision was practiced among faithful Israelites in Egypt, though it declined or ceased for others.
Some traditions say tribes like Levi remained more faithful during Egyptian bondage (cf. Exodus 32:26), suggesting the Levites may have preserved circumcision more strictly.
The sign of the Abrahamic covenant (Genesis 17:10–14) was circumcision, and failure to circumcise meant cutting off from the covenant community.
For Israel's deliverance to be based on God's covenant with Abraham (Exodus 2:24–25), there had to remain at least a core of circumcised Israelites, especially among the leaders.
Yes, the Jewish priests in Egypt were circumcised, and this is provable through:
Scriptural deduction: Passover participants had to be circumcised (Ex. 12:48), and Aaron and Moses participated.
Priestly qualifications: Aaron could not have served as high priest if he were uncircumcised.
Covenantal continuity: God honored His covenant with Abraham, implying at least partial continuity of the covenant sign.
Historical Jewish tradition: The tribe of Levi was more faithful than others during Egypt and likely maintained circumcision.
Would you like sources from Jewish commentators or early church fathers as well?
In Joshua 5:2–9, we are explicitly told that the generation born in the wilderness had not been circumcised. The reason is given:
“All the people who came out of Egypt had been circumcised, but all the people born in the wilderness on the way after they came out of Egypt had not been circumcised.” (Joshua 5:5, ESV)
So, two facts are clear:
The original Israelites who entered Egypt were circumcised.
Their descendants stopped circumcising either during slavery or in the wilderness.
There is no direct biblical record of Israel practicing circumcision while in Egypt. Several theories explain why:
Egyptian slavery may have made religious practices like circumcision difficult or dangerous. As foreign slaves, Israelites likely had little freedom to perform rituals. Egyptians also practiced their own form of circumcision, typically partial and at puberty—not infancy—so Israelite circumcision may have been seen as foreign or threatening.
Ezekiel 20:5–8 strongly suggests that the Israelites fell into idolatry while in Egypt:
“...they rebelled against Me and would not listen to Me. They did not cast away the idols of Egypt.”
This spiritual compromise may have led to the neglect of the covenant sign (circumcision), since it symbolized faithfulness to God's covenant with Abraham.
Even after the Exodus, circumcision was not resumed during the 40 years in the wilderness. This seems to be an act of divine judgment or consequence:
God may have withheld the covenant sign from the disobedient generation that would not enter the Promised Land (cf. Numbers 14). The delay in circumcision parallels the delay in entering the land. Only after the wilderness generation died off did Joshua resume circumcision at Gilgal.
Joshua 5 presents the circumcision at Gilgal as a national renewal of the covenant, once the new generation was poised to inherit the land. God says:
“Today I have rolled away the reproach of Egypt from you.” (Joshua 5:9)
This implies that lack of circumcision had left them under spiritual reproach, which was only removed once they re-obeyed.
In a deeper sense, circumcision symbolized separation, obedience, and identity with God's covenant. Neglecting it during Egyptian bondage and the wilderness symbolizes:
Israel's loss of identity under oppression
God's displeasure with their unbelief
The need for renewed obedience in the new land
The Jews were not circumcised in Egypt likely due to a combination of:
Oppression and loss of religious freedom
Spiritual compromise and idolatry
God’s judgment during the wilderness period
A divine plan to renew the covenant only upon entering Canaan
This neglect was reversed in Joshua 5, when circumcision resumed as a public recommitment to God's covenant with Abraham.
Would you like the Jewish rabbinic view or early Christian interpretations (e.g., in the Church Fathers) as well?
It is very likely that some Jews (Israelites) in Egypt were not circumcised at the time of the first Passover, and therefore did not participate in the meal.
Because Exodus 12:43–48 explicitly forbids any uncircumcised person from eating the Passover:
Exodus 12:48 –
“No uncircumcised person shall eat thereof.”
This law applied not only to foreigners or servants, but to Israelites themselves. Participation in the Passover required circumcision as a covenant sign.
During the centuries in Egypt, the Israelites fell into neglect of circumcision, especially during their slavery.
Joshua 5:5 –
“Now all the people that came out were circumcised: but all the people that were born in the wilderness... them they had not circumcised.”
This suggests that only a segment of Israel maintained the practice, and likely only those who obeyed God's command were circumcised before the first Passover in order to participate.
✅ Some Israelites were circumcised before the first Passover and ate it.
🚫 Some were not circumcised and were therefore excluded from the meal.
There is no mention of mass punishment for uncircumcised Israelites at that moment — only that they could not participate in the covenant meal.
There were likely Israelites in Egypt who were not circumcised at the time of the first Passover.
They would have been excluded from eating the lamb, according to God's command in Exodus 12:48.
Only those who obeyed and were circumcised took part in that foundational covenant meal.
The uncircumcised Israelites were not automatically killed by the angel of death unless they disobeyed God’s specific command to apply the blood of the lamb.
“When I see the blood, I will pass over you, and the plague shall not be upon you to destroy you…”
God's judgment passed over houses marked with blood, regardless of who was inside — circumcised or not. The protection was based on obedience to the instruction to kill a lamb and apply its blood to the doorposts.
If an uncircumcised Israelite lived in a house where the blood of the lamb was applied, then that house was passed over.
Circumcision was a requirement to eat the Passover lamb (Exodus 12:48), but not explicitly a requirement for deliverance from the plague.
The judgment came to the firstborn in homes without the blood, not to individuals based on personal circumcision status.
| Condition | Consequence |
|---|---|
| Blood applied to the doorpost | Death angel passes over the house |
| No blood on the doorpost | The firstborn in that house dies |
| An uncircumcised person in a protected house | Likely spared, but excluded from eating the lamb |
| Uncircumcised, disobedient, and did not apply blood | Firstborn likely perished |
God's instructions were very clear. Those who believed and obeyed applied the blood, and their households were protected. The issue at Passover was not primarily circumcision, but faith shown through obedience (Hebrews 11:28).
Hebrews 11:28 – “Through faith he kept the Passover, and the sprinkling of blood, lest he that destroyed the firstborn should touch them.”
So, while circumcision determined who could eat the lamb, it was the blood on the doorposts that saved the firstborn — and this was the dividing line between life and death that night in Egypt.
Born in 1783, Trott's early life details are sparse. He initially joined a Presbyterian church, where he described himself as a "pretty strict formalist" and a "legalist." Over time, his theological views evolved, leading him to embrace Baptist principles. On December 22, 1810, he was baptized by Elder William Parkinson in New York City. By 1816, Trott had moved to Ohio, where he engaged in teaching and preaching.
Trott emerged as a leading figure among Baptists who opposed the modern missionary movement and other "new measures" being introduced into Baptist and Protestant churches during the late 18th and early 19th centuries. Alongside Elder Gilbert Beebe, he was instrumental in articulating the principles of the Old School Baptists, emphasizing a return to what they viewed as the original doctrines and practices of the church.
One of Trott's most notable contributions was his involvement in drafting the Black Rock Address in 1832. This document delineated the distinctions between the Old School (Primitive) Baptists and those adopting new practices such as mission societies, Sunday schools, and theological seminaries. The address articulated the Old School Baptists' commitment to traditional Baptist ecclesiology and their rejection of what they perceived as unscriptural innovations.
Trott served as the pastor of the Welsh Tract Baptist Church in Newark, Delaware, a congregation with historical significance among Baptists. He was also a prolific writer, contributing extensively to publications like the "Signs of the Times," where he addressed various theological topics, including the doctrine of predestination. His writings often emphasized the sovereignty of God and the doctrinal positions of the Old School Baptists.
Elder Samuel S. Trott lost a son in the Mexican-American War. His son, William Trott, enlisted and served in the war but tragically died during the conflict. William Trott was a soldier in the United States Army during the Mexican-American War (1846–1848), a conflict that arose between the U.S. and Mexico after the annexation of Texas and territorial disputes in the southwestern U.S. Death in Battle: William Trott, who was likely in his late teens or early 20s at the time, was killed in battle during the war. The exact details of his death are not fully documented in the sources, but it is known that many young men, including soldiers from various backgrounds, lost their lives in the intense and bloody conflict.
William Trott’s death deeply affected Samuel Trott, and it is noted in some of the biographical accounts of Samuel's life. The loss of a son in such a tumultuous and significant war was a personal tragedy for Trott and highlighted the difficult realities that many families faced during this period of American history.
In his later years, Trott continued to minister and write, remaining a steadfast advocate for the principles he had long championed. He passed away in 1866 at the age of 83. His contributions left a lasting impact on the Primitive Baptist tradition, and his writings continue to be referenced by those within the movement.
The subscription price is $15.00 per year. It comes out monthly. We encourage all to subscribe!
Here is the address: