 |
| https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0GP3C6CC8 |
Saturday, February 21, 2026
DO NOT GRIEVE THE HOLY SPIRIT (Santasmaria)
In Pocket Beebe, look for the article titled “Quench Not the Spirit.—I Thess. V. 19” (it’s a Signs of the Times editorial dated Middletown, N.Y., July 1, 1857). In that piece, Beebe explains “grieving” (Eph. 4:30 language) and “quenching” (1 Thess. 5:19) together, and he draws his famous distinction.
Here are the key lines, exactly in his wording:
“Those admonitions… cannot be so construed as to signify that God is a being subject to passions like us.” (sovereignredeemerbooks.com)
“[Not] that he can be grieved and extinguished by his creatures.” (sovereignredeemerbooks.com)
“This spirit which is born of the Spirit is not God, but it is of God.” (sovereignredeemerbooks.com)
“It is called, ‘the holy Spirit of God, whereby ye are sealed unto the day of redemption.’—Eph. iv. 30… distinguished from the Holy Ghost, which is God.” (sovereignredeemerbooks.com)
“This spirit… is susceptible of grief… elevation and depression… totally inapplicable to God, the eternal Spirit.” (sovereignredeemerbooks.com)
And when he finally nails down what “quenching” means in practice, he says: “To quench… the spirit… is to walk after the flesh.” (sovereignredeemerbooks.com)
Friday, February 20, 2026
The Infernal Blaze of Brotherly Love: An Odyssey Through φιλαδελφία and חֶסֶד, Igniting the Soul with Biblical Fire (Santamaria)
From the blood-soaked sands of first-century persecution, where emperors’ swords cleaved families and lions devoured the faithful, erupts a divine mandate that shakes the heavens and rends the earth: Τὸ τέλος πάντες ὁμόφρονες, συμπαθεῖς, φιλάδελφοι, εὔσπλαγχνοι, ταπεινόφρονες (1 Peter 3:8)—“Finally, all of you, have unity of mind, sympathy, brotherly love (φιλαδελφία), a tender heart, and a humble mind!”
Thursday, February 19, 2026
MOSES WILL ACCUSE YOU TO THE FATHER (Santamaria)
“Do not think that I will accuse you to the Father… Moses… accuses you.” (John 5:45)
Wednesday, February 18, 2026
LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR AS YOURSELF (Santamaria)
“Love thy neighbor as thyself” is one of those lines that sounds simple until you actually stare at it long enough for it to stare back.
It shows up first in the Holiness Code of Leviticus:
Hebrew (Lev. 19:18): וְאָהַבְתָּ לְרֵעֲךָ כָּמוֹךָ אֲנִי יְהוָה
Transliteration: wə’āhavtā lərē‘ăkā kāmōkā, ’ănī YHWH
Literal sense: “And you shall love your neighbor as yourself; I am YHWH.”
Tuesday, February 17, 2026
Monday, February 16, 2026
“Of Him, and Through Him, and To Him” (Smith)
Romans 11:35–36
“For who hath first given to him, and it shall be recompensed unto him again?
Sunday, February 15, 2026
Paul’s words here (I Timothy 1:3–4) (Santamaria)
Paul’s words here (I Timothy 1:3–4) are not the polite opening of a theologian arranging his bookshelf. They’re the urgent voice of an apostle doing triage in a living church. He’s left Timothy in a real place with real people and a real contagion: teaching that sounds “religious” but quietly reroutes the soul away from Christ, away from faith, away from the actual work of God.
Saturday, February 14, 2026
IN THE LAST DAYS II TIMOTHY 4 (Santamaria)
Paul’s warning in II Timothy 4:3–4 is not subtle. It’s one of those passages where the apostle stops speaking like a gentle counselor and starts speaking like a fire bell in the night. And what makes it so disturbing is that he doesn’t predict the church will merely be attacked from the outside. He predicts the church will be hollowed out from within by a kind of spiritual consumerism—people treating “teaching” the way Rome treated entertainment: as something purchased to satisfy taste.
Friday, February 13, 2026
II TImothy 3 (Santamaria)
II Timothy 3 is Paul taking Timothy by the collar—lovingly, urgently—and turning his face toward reality. Not the sentimental “reality” of motivational quotes, but the gritty kind where truth costs something, where counterfeit religion is more dangerous than open hostility, and where Scripture is not an ornament but oxygen.
Thursday, February 12, 2026
Unshakable Fidelity: The Eternal Immutability of 2 Timothy 2:13 – A Magnum Opus of Divine Faithfulness
The line comes at the end of a little “faithful saying” Paul sets in the middle of a hard letter. You can almost hear the cadence of something early Christians repeated to each other when the room got cold, and the future felt sharp. Paul is not writing from a lecture hall. He is writing from the Roman world’s underside, where the state keeps the inconvenient: prisoners, dissidents, and the kinds of men who keep announcing a rival Lord.
Wednesday, February 11, 2026
Of Him, Through Him, and To Him: The Glory of God in All Things (Smith)
There is a phrase commonly heard among professing Christians: “I hope God gets the glory.” Closely related is another statement: “That doesn’t glorify God.” These expressions are often spoken sincerely, yet sincerity alone does not determine truth. Our language, like our theology, must be governed by Scripture rather than emotion, tradition, or human reasoning.
Tuesday, February 10, 2026
Monday, February 9, 2026
Sought Repentance (Santamaria)
The line people often mean when they say “Judas sought repentance” is actually Hebrews 12:17—and that text is about Esau, not Judas. Judas does “repent” in the KJV (Matthew 27:3), but the Greek verb there is not the usual New Testament verb for gospel repentance. That difference is not a nerdy footnote. It’s the knife-edge between worldly remorse and repentance unto life.
The Unsearchable Judgments of God (Smith)
The Unsearchable Judgments of God
Romans 11:33–34
“O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! how unsearchable are his judgments, and his ways past finding out! For who hath known the mind of the Lord? or who hath been his counsellor?”
Sunday, February 8, 2026
Saturday, February 7, 2026
Of Him, Through Him, and To Him: The Glory of God in All Things (Smith)
There is a phrase commonly heard among professing Christians: “I hope God gets the glory.” Closely related is another statement: “That doesn’t glorify God.” These expressions are often spoken sincerely, yet sincerity alone does not determine truth. Our language, like our theology, must be governed by Scripture rather than emotion, tradition, or human reasoning.
Friday, February 6, 2026
For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him (Smith)
Colossians 1:16
For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him:
Thursday, February 5, 2026
FOR HE THAT IS NOT AGAINST US ON OUR PART (Santamaria)
A strange kind of spiritual ugliness shows itself when people can watch evil being pushed back and still feel irritated. That is exactly what happens in the Gospel of Mark 9. A man is “casting out devils” in the Name of Jesus Christ, and the disciples’ first response is not gratitude, not awe, not the holy relief that comes when darkness loses ground. Their first response is to shut him down—because he isn’t wearing their jersey.
TRACTS ON LIBERTY OF CONSCIENCE Kindle Edition $5.00 by Guilllermo Santamaria (Author) Format: Kindle Edition
According to a document from the Hansard Knollys Society’s first subscription cycle (1845–1846), this volume is a curated “first principles” anthology meant to put early English Baptist voices back into circulation—especially the ones who argued, at personal cost, that the state has no jurisdiction over the soul. It frames that project explicitly as a recovery of Baptist history and as a reminder that Baptists “first assert[ed] in this land… the right of every man to worship God as conscience dictates, in submission only to divine command,” and that they clung to that liberty through imprisonment and persecution.
Wednesday, February 4, 2026
I am glad therefore on your behalf; but I would have you wise unto that which is good, and simple concerning evil. Rom 16.19 (Santamaria)
Paul’s sentence in Romans 16:19 is like a bright, hard star after the storm-cloud warning of verse 18. He has just described the smooth-talking deceivers—χρηστολογία and εὐλογία, honeyed words used to ἐξαπατᾶν, to thoroughly mislead the unsuspecting (ἀκάκους). Then he turns, almost with relief, toward the believers themselves: “I’m glad for you.”
Tuesday, February 3, 2026
For they that serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, But their own belly... (Rom. 16.18) Santamaria
Romans 16:18 is Paul doing emergency surgery with a single sentence. No anesthesia. No polite throat-clearing. Just a clean incision through the soft tissue of religious sentimentality—because he loves Christ, and he loves the church, and he knows how easily a flock can be scattered by a voice that sounds like a shepherd but serves like a wolf.
UPCOMING BOOK FROM WELSH TRACT PUBLLICATIONS ON RELIGIOUS LIBERTY (Santamaria)
This work matters in Baptist history because it’s not a later “Baptists were always for freedom” victory lap—it’s early, primary-source Baptist-era argumentation where the principle is hammered out while the bruises are still fresh. Thisvolume even states bluntly that Leonard Busher’s tract “remains to us as the *earliest t on this great theme.” That’s historical gold: it lets you watch early Baptists (and their close allies) reason from Scripture to a public ethic in real time—before “religious liberty” became the respectable thing to say at civic banquets. (Wikipedia)
It’s also important because it shows what Baptists meant by liberty of conscience: not “anything goes,” but a jurisdictional claim—the magistrate’s job is to punish civil wrongs, not police salvation. The text points to Gallio’s refusal to referee religious disputes—“I will be no judge of such matters”—as the model for government res Then it goes straight for the theological jugular: Christ didn’t spread truth by coercion; “the Son of man is not come to destroy men’s lives, but to save them,” so persecution in the name of Christ is treated as a category The “why” is stated with unusual clarity: the goal is “setting at liberty that which God made free, even the consc
In the story of Baptist identity, this theme isn’t a side quest—it becomes one of the tradition’s signature fingerprints. The foreword-level material claims that “to the Baptists… belongs the honour of first asserting… the right of every man to worship God as conscience dictates. And it situates these arguments in the orbit of Thomas Helwys and the early English Baptist community that, as the book notes, “norsecution… for conscience’ sake.” That’s not just pious talk: Helwys’ A Short Declaration of the Mystery of Iniquity is widely treated as a landmark statement of religious liberty in English Baptist origins. (The Free Speech Center)
Finally, this collection is important because it preserves the logic chain that later Baptists kept reusing—across confessions, controversies, and continents. The arguments here (conscience before God, Christ’s non-coercive kingdom, limits of civil authority) are the same conceptual engine behind later Baptist appeals for church–state separation in both Britain and America. (ifl.web.baylor.edu) Even if you end up disagreeing with parts of the rhetoric or historical framing, the texts remain a kind of Baptist “source code”: you can trace how a persecuted minority forged a durable theological case for freedom that outlived the particular persecution that provoked it.
Monday, February 2, 2026
WHAT HAS GOD WROUGHT? (Santamaria)
Samuel F. B. Morse used “What hath God wrought?” (Numbers 23:23, KJV) most famously in his first public long-distance telegraph demonstration.
May 24, 1844 — the first big send.
In the U.S. Capitol (then in the Supreme Court chamber), Morse tapped out “What hath God wrought?” over the new Washington, D.C. ↔ Baltimore experimental line to his partner/assistant Alfred Vail, who received it at Baltimore’s Mount Clare depot and sent the confirmation back. The phrase was suggested by Annie Ellsworth and was recorded on the early system’s paper tape.
Sunday, February 1, 2026
He is not willing II Peter 3.9 (Santamaria)
Second Peter 3:9 is one of those verses that people love to rip out of its habitat, stick under a microscope, and then announce, “Aha! I have discovered the author’s worldview.” But Peter didn’t write a fortune cookie. He wrote a pastoral warning to “beloved” saints living under scoffers, delay-anxiety, and the temptation to reinterpret God’s promises based on the clock.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)